[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72214339-57fc-e47f-bb57-d1b39c69e38e@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:38:10 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts
On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
> index a564f36e260c..5b6940c90c61 100644
> --- a/fs/io-wq.c
> +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
> @@ -1090,10 +1091,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
> wqe->node = alloc_node;
> wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].max_workers = bounded;
> atomic_set(&wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].nr_running, 0);
> - if (wq->user) {
> - wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers =
> - task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
> - }
> + wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
This doesn't look like an equivalent transformation. But that may be
moot if we merge the io_uring-worker.v3 series, as then you would not
have to touch io-wq at all.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
