Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210206104514.GB27503@dragon>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:45:15 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/acpi: disallow writeable AML opregion
 mapping for EFI code regions

On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 09:10:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 04:11, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 05:58:32PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Given that the contents of EFI runtime code and data regions are
> > > provided by the firmware, as well as the DSDT, it is not unimaginable
> > > that AML code exists today that accesses EFI runtime code regions using
> > > a SystemMemory OpRegion. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with that,
> > > but since we take great care to ensure that executable code is never
> > > mapped writeable and executable at the same time, we should not permit
> > > AML to create writable mapping.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> >
> > I'm booting Lenovo Flex 5G laptop with ACPI, and seeing this change
> > causes a memory abort[1] when upgrading ACPI tables via initrd[2].
> > Dropping this change seems to fix the issue for me.  But does that
> > looks like a correct fix to you?
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> > [1] https://fileserver.linaro.org/s/iDe9SaZeNNkyNxG
> > [2] Documentation/admin-guide/acpi/initrd_table_override.rst
> >
> 
> Can you check whether reverting
> 
> 32cf1a12cad43358e47dac8014379c2f33dfbed4
> 
> fixes the issue too?

Yes, it does.

> If it does, please report this as a regression. The OS should not
> modify firmware provided tables in-place, regardless of how they were
> delivered.
> 
> BTW I recently started using my Yoga C630 with Debian, and I am quite
> happy with it! Thanks a lot for spending the time on the installer
> etc.

Cool, glad to hear that!

Shawn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.