[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92df89c9-3442-0761-224a-ab53bb917850@digikod.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:03:47 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 00/12] Landlock LSM
On 14/01/2021 04:22, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>> This patch series adds new built-time checks, a new test, renames some
>> variables and functions to improve readability, and shift syscall
>> numbers to align with -next.
>
> Sorry, I've finally gotten around to looking at v26 - I hadn't
> actually looked at v25 either yet. I think there's still one remaining
> small issue in the filesystem access logic, but I think that's very
> simple to fix, as long as we agree on what the expected semantics are.
> Otherwise it basically looks good, apart from some typos.
>
> I think v27 will be the final version of this series. :) (And I'll try
> to actually look at that version much faster - I realize that waiting
> for code reviews this long sucks.)
>
I'm improving the tests, especially with bind mounts and overlayfs
tests. The v27 will also contains a better documentation to clarify the
semantic and explain how these mounts are handled. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
