|
Message-ID: <202101131001.BF1108F90@keescook> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:01:55 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> Cc: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] Use atomic type for ucounts reference counting On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:31:40AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com> writes: > > We might want to use refcount_t instead of atomic_t. Not a big deal > either way. Yes, please use refcount_t, and don't use _read() since that introduces races. -Kees > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com> > > --- > > include/linux/user_namespace.h | 2 +- > > kernel/ucount.c | 10 +++++----- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h > > index 64cf8ebdc4ec..84fefa9247c4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h > > +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h > > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct ucounts { > > struct hlist_node node; > > struct user_namespace *ns; > > kuid_t uid; > > - int count; > > + atomic_t count; > > atomic_t ucount[UCOUNT_COUNTS]; > > }; > > > > diff --git a/kernel/ucount.c b/kernel/ucount.c > > index 11b1596e2542..0f2c7c11df19 100644 > > --- a/kernel/ucount.c > > +++ b/kernel/ucount.c > > @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ static struct ucounts *get_ucounts(struct user_namespace *ns, kuid_t uid) > > > > new->ns = ns; > > new->uid = uid; > > - new->count = 0; > > + > > + atomic_set(&new->count, 0); > > > > spin_lock_irq(&ucounts_lock); > > ucounts = find_ucounts(ns, uid, hashent); > > @@ -152,10 +153,10 @@ static struct ucounts *get_ucounts(struct user_namespace *ns, kuid_t uid) > > ucounts = new; > > } > > } > > - if (ucounts->count == INT_MAX) > > + if (atomic_read(&ucounts->count) == INT_MAX) > > ucounts = NULL; > > else > > - ucounts->count += 1; > > + atomic_inc(&ucounts->count); > > spin_unlock_irq(&ucounts_lock); > > return ucounts; > > } > > @@ -165,8 +166,7 @@ static void put_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts) > > unsigned long flags; > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&ucounts_lock, flags); > > - ucounts->count -= 1; > > - if (!ucounts->count) > > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ucounts->count)) > > hlist_del_init(&ucounts->node); > > else > > ucounts = NULL; > > > This can become: > static void put_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts) > { > unsigned long flags; > > if (atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(&ucounts->count, &ucounts_lock, flags)) { > hlist_del_init(&ucounts->node); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ucounts_lock); > kfree(ucounts); > } > } > -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.