[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASQPOGohtUyzBM6n54pzpLN35kDXC7VbvWzX8QWUmqq9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:42:21 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Add support for Clang LTO
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:31 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:01:31PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Sami,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 02:07:14PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> > > Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> > > motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) to
> > > be used in the kernel. Google has shipped millions of Pixel devices
> > > running three major kernel versions with LTO+CFI since 2018.
> > >
> > > Most of the patches are build system changes for handling LLVM bitcode,
> > > which Clang produces with LTO instead of ELF object files, postponing
> > > ELF processing until a later stage, and ensuring initcall ordering.
> > >
> > > Note that v7 brings back arm64 support as Will has now staged the
> > > prerequisite memory ordering patches [1], and drops x86_64 while we work
> > > on fixing the remaining objtool warnings [2].
> >
> > Sounds like you're going to post a v8, but that's the plan for merging
> > that? The arm64 parts look pretty good to me now.
>
> I haven't seen Masahiro comment on this in a while, so given the review
> history and its use (for years now) in Android, I will carry v8 (assuming
> all is fine with it) it in -next unless there are objections.
What I dislike about this implementation is
it cannot drop any unreachable function/data.
(and it is completely different from GCC LTO)
This is not real LTO.
> --
> Kees Cook
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/202012010929.3788AF5%40keescook.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
