Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:29:35 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <>
To: Kees Cook <>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <>,
	Nick Desaulniers <>,
	Masahiro Yamada <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>, Will Deacon <>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <>,
	clang-built-linux <>,
	Kernel Hardening <>,
	linux-arch <>,
	Linux ARM <>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <>,
	LKML <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/17] kbuild: add support for Clang LTO

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:47:21AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:23:11AM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > Changing the ThinLTO config to a choice and moving it after the main
> > LTO config sounds like a good idea to me. I'll see if I can change
> > this in v8. Thanks!
> Originally, I thought this might be a bit ugly once GCC LTO is added,
> but this could be just a choice like we're done for the stack
> initialization. Something like an "LTO" choice of NONE, CLANG_FULL,
> CLANG_THIN, and in the future GCC, etc.

Having two separate choices might be a little bit cleaner though? One
for the compiler (LTO_CLANG versus LTO_GCC) and one for the type
(THINLTO versus FULLLTO). The type one could just have a "depends on
CC_IS_CLANG" to ensure it only showed up when needed.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.