[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKuf+Ev=hpCUfDpCFR_wBACr-539opJsSFrDcpDA9Ctp7rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:59:55 -0800
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:46 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:29:24PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:11:41PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > CONFIG_XEN
> > >
> > > __switch_to_asm()+0x0: undefined stack state
> > > xen_hypercall_set_trap_table()+0x0: <=== (sym)
>
> With your branch + GCC 9 I can recreate all the warnings except this
> one.
In a gcc build this warning is replaced with a different one:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __startup_secondary_64()+0x7: return with
modified stack frame
This just seems to depend on which function is placed right after the
code in xen-head.S. With gcc, the disassembly looks like this:
0000000000000000 <asm_cpu_bringup_and_idle>:
0: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 5 <asm_cpu_bringup_and_idle+0x5>
1: R_X86_64_PLT32 cpu_bringup_and_idle-0x4
5: e9 f6 0f 00 00 jmpq 1000
<xen_hypercall_set_trap_table>
...
0000000000001000 <xen_hypercall_set_trap_table>:
...
...
0000000000002000 <__startup_secondary_64>:
With Clang+LTO, we end up with __switch_to_asm here instead of
__startup_secondary_64.
> Will do some digging on the others...
Thanks!
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
