|
Message-ID: <CABCJKuc_-Sxj8HLajx4pKuBpU3AUdBtPv4uzQfMWqVHWwHS1iQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:48:01 -0800 From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:29 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote: > How would I recreate all these warnings? You can reproduce all of these using a normal gcc build without any of the LTO patches by running objtool check -arfld vmlinux.o. However, with gcc you'll see even more warnings due to duplicate symbol names, as Peter pointed out elsewhere in the thread, so I looked at only the warnings that objtool also prints with LTO. Note that the LTO series contains a patch to split noinstr validation from --vmlinux, as we need to run objtool here even if CONFIG_VMLINUX_VALIDATION isn't selected, so I have not looked at the noinstr warnings. The latest LTO tree is available here: https://github.com/samitolvanen/linux/commits/clang-lto > Here's the patch for hopefully making the warnings more helpful: Thanks, I'll give it a try. Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.