|
Message-ID: <056d8f1a-b45f-379f-d81a-8c13a1536c3f@digikod.net> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:03:45 +0100 From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control On 29/10/2020 02:06, Jann Horn wrote: > (On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:04 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote: >> diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c > [...] >> +static inline u32 get_file_access(const struct file *const file) >> +{ >> + u32 access = 0; >> + >> + if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) { >> + /* A directory can only be opened in read mode. */ >> + if (S_ISDIR(file_inode(file)->i_mode)) >> + return LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR; >> + access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE; >> + } >> + /* >> + * A LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_APPEND could be added but we also need to check >> + * fcntl(2). >> + */ > > Once https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/20200831153207.GO3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx/ > lands, pwritev2() with RWF_NOAPPEND will also be problematic for > classifying "write" vs "append"; you may want to include that in the > comment. (Or delete the comment.) Contrary to fcntl(2), pwritev2(2) doesn't seems to modify the file description. Otherwise, other LSMs would need to be patched. I'll remove this comment anyway. > >> + if (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) >> + access |= LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE; >> + /* __FMODE_EXEC is indeed part of f_flags, not f_mode. */ >> + if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) >> + access |= LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE; >> + return access; >> +} > [...] >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.