Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2010150746120.4000@namei.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 07:46:21 +1100 (AEDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote:

> 
> On 14/10/2020 20:52, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > 
> > On 14/10/2020 20:07, James Morris wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >>
> >>> +config ARCH_EPHEMERAL_STATES
> >>> +	def_bool n
> >>> +	help
> >>> +	  An arch should select this symbol if it does not keep an internal kernel
> >>> +	  state for kernel objects such as inodes, but instead relies on something
> >>> +	  else (e.g. the host kernel for an UML kernel).
> >>> +
> >>
> >> This is used to disable Landlock for UML, correct?
> > 
> > Yes
> > 
> >> I wonder if it could be 
> >> more specific: "ephemeral states" is a very broad term.
> >>
> >> How about something like ARCH_OWN_INODES ?
> > 
> > Sounds good. We may need add new ones (e.g. for network socket, UID,
> > etc.) in the future though.
> > 
> 
> Because UML is the exception here, it would be more convenient to keep
> the inverted semantic. What about ARCH_NO_OWN_INODES or
> ARCH_EPHEMERAL_INODES?

The latter seems good.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.