Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:21:01 -0700
From: Kees Cook <>
Cc: Kees Cook <>,
	John Wood <>,
	Matthew Wilcox <>,
	Jonathan Corbet <>,
	Alexander Viro <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Juri Lelli <>,
	Vincent Guittot <>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	Ben Segall <>,
	Mel Gorman <>,
	Luis Chamberlain <>,
	Iurii Zaikin <>,
	James Morris <>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <>,,,,
Subject: [RESEND][RFC PATCH 0/6] Fork brute force attack mitigation (fbfam)

[kees: re-sending this series on behalf of John Wood <>
 also visible at fbfam]

From: John Wood <>

The goal of this patch serie is to detect and mitigate a fork brute force

Attacks with the purpose to break ASLR or bypass canaries traditionaly use
some level of brute force with the help of the fork system call. This is
possible since when creating a new process using fork its memory contents
are the same as those of the parent process (the process that called the
fork system call). So, the attacker can test the memory infinite times to
find the correct memory values or the correct memory addresses without
worrying about crashing the application.

Based on the above scenario it would be nice to have this detected and
mitigated, and this is the goal of this implementation.

Other implementations

The public version of grsecurity, as a summary, is based on the idea of
delay the fork system call if a child died due to a fatal error. This has
some issues:

1.- Bad practices: Add delays to the kernel is, in general, a bad idea.

2.- Weak points: This protection can be bypassed using two different
    methods since it acts only when the fork is called after a child has

    2.1.- Bypass 1: So, it would still be possible for an attacker to fork
	  a big amount of children (in the order of thousands), then probe
	  all of them, and finally wait the protection time before repeat
	  the steps.

    2.2.- Bypass 2: This method is based on the idea that the protection
	  doesn't act if the parent crashes. So, it would still be possible
	  for an attacker to fork a process and probe itself. Then, fork
	  the child process and probe itself again. This way, these steps
	  can be repeated infinite times without any mitigation.

This implementation

The main idea behind this implementation is to improve the existing ones
focusing on the weak points annotated before. So, the solution for the
first bypass method is to detect a fast crash rate instead of only one
simple crash. For the second bypass method the solution is to detect both
the crash of parent and child processes. Moreover, as a mitigation method
it is better to kill all the offending tasks involve in the attack instead
of use delays.

So, the solution to the two bypass methods previously commented is to use
some statistical data shared across all the processes that can have the
same memory contents. Or in other words, a statistical data shared between
all the processes that fork the task 0, and all the processes that fork
after an execve system call.

These statistics hold the timestamp for the first fork (case of a fork of
task zero) or the timestamp for the execve system call (the other case).
Also, hold the number of faults of all the tasks that share the same
statistical data since the commented timestamp.

With this information it is possible to detect a brute force attack when a
task die in a fatal way computing the crashing rate. This rate shows the
milliseconds per fault and when it goes under a certain threshold there is
a clear signal that something malicious is happening.

Once detected, the mitigation only kills the processes that share the same
statistical data and so, all the tasks that can have the same memory
contents. This way, an attack is rejected.

The fbfam feature can be enabled, disabled and tuned as follows:

1.- Per system enabling: This feature can be enabled in build time using
    the config application under:

    Security options  --->  Fork brute force attack mitigation

2.- Per process enabling/disabling: To allow that specific applications can
    turn off or turn on the detection and mitigation of a fork brute force
    attack when required, there are two new prctls.

    prctl(PR_FBFAM_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0)  -> To enable the feature
    prctl(PR_FBFAM_DISABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0) -> To disable the feature

    Both functions return zero on success and -EFAULT if the current task
    doesn't have statistical data.

3.- Fine tuning: To customize the detection's sensibility there is a new
    sysctl that allows to set the crashing rate threshold. It is accessible
    through the file:


    The units are in milliseconds per fault and the attack's mitigation is
    triggered if the crashing rate of an application goes under this
    threshold. So, the higher this value, the faster an attack will be

So, knowing all this information I will explain now the different patches:

The 1/9 patch adds a new config for the fbfam feature.

The 2/9 and 3/9 patches add and use the api to manage the statistical data
necessary to compute the crashing rate of an application.

The 4/9 patch adds a new sysctl to fine tuning the detection's sensibility.

The 5/9 patch detects a fork brute force attack calculating the crashing

The 6/9 patch mitigates the attack killing all the offending tasks.

The 7/9 patch adds two new prctls to allow per task enabling/disabling.

The 8/9 patch adds general documentation.

The 9/9 patch adds an entry to the maintainers list.

This patch series is a task of the KSPP [1] and it is worth to mention
that there is a previous attempt without any continuation [2].


Any constructive comments are welcome.

Note: During the compilation these warnings were shown:

kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x18: unreachable instruction
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.o: warning: objtool: mce_panic()+0x123: unreachable instruction
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.o: warning: objtool: native_play_dead()+0x122: unreachable instruction
net/core/skbuff.o: warning: objtool: skb_push.cold()+0x14: unreachable instruction

John Wood (6):
  security/fbfam: Add a Kconfig to enable the fbfam feature
  security/fbfam: Add the api to manage statistics
  security/fbfam: Use the api to manage statistics
  security/fbfam: Add a new sysctl to control the crashing rate
  security/fbfam: Detect a fork brute force attack
  security/fbfam: Mitigate a fork brute force attack

 fs/coredump.c           |   2 +
 fs/exec.c               |   2 +
 include/fbfam/fbfam.h   |  24 ++++
 include/linux/sched.h   |   4 +
 kernel/exit.c           |   2 +
 kernel/fork.c           |   4 +
 kernel/sysctl.c         |   9 ++
 security/Kconfig        |   1 +
 security/Makefile       |   4 +
 security/fbfam/Kconfig  |  10 ++
 security/fbfam/Makefile |   3 +
 security/fbfam/fbfam.c  | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/fbfam/sysctl.c |  20 +++
 13 files changed, 364 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/fbfam/fbfam.h
 create mode 100644 security/fbfam/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 security/fbfam/Makefile
 create mode 100644 security/fbfam/fbfam.c
 create mode 100644 security/fbfam/sysctl.c


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.