[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200830174409.c24c3f67addcce0cea9a9d4c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:44:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com>
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, re.emese@...il.com, maennich@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:54:05 +0530 Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> wrote:
> commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file
> spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license
> information.
The x bit shouldn't matter.
If someone downloads and applies patch-5.9.xz (which is a supported way
of obtaining a kernel) then patch(1) will erase the x bit anyway.
Is some other script invoking spdxcheck-test.sh directly, instead of
using `/bin/sh spdxcheck-test.sh'? If so, please let's fix that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
