|
Message-ID: <20200827100008.GA403378@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:00:08 +0200 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> Cc: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, re.emese@...il.com, maennich@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:49:31AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:54:05PM +0530, Mrinal Pandey wrote: > > > commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file > > > spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license > > > information. > > > > > > commit eb8305aecb95 ("scripts: Coccinelle script for namespace > > > dependencies.") added the file nsdeps, commit 313dd1b62921 ("gcc-plugins: > > > Add the randstruct plugin") added the file gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh > > > and commit 9b4ade226f74 ("xen: build infrastructure for generating > > > hypercall depending symbols") added the file xen-hypercalls.sh without the > > > executable bit. > > > > > > Set to usual modes for these files and provide the SPDX license for > > > spdxcheck-test.sh. No functional changes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> > > > --- > > > applies cleanly on next-20200827 > > > > > > Kees, Matthias, Thomas, please ack this patch. > > > > > > Andrew, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch once the > > > mainainers ack. > > > > > > scripts/gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh | 0 > > > scripts/nsdeps | 0 > > > scripts/spdxcheck-test.sh | 1 + > > > scripts/xen-hypercalls.sh | 0 > > > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh > > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/nsdeps > > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/spdxcheck-test.sh > > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/xen-hypercalls.sh > > > > This does 2 different things in one patch, shouldn't this be 2 different > > patches? One to change the permissions and one to add the SPDX line? > > > > For me, this was one thing: minor cleanup; and taking one > minor patch is easier than taking two, but you make the call. Then, the > two or even three patches would also just travel through different trees, > the spdx tree and Andrew's. License "additions" are good to separate from other changes, in case people have questions/comments/objections about them, they can be easier to discuss and possibly reverted. More patches is not a problem :) thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.