|
Message-ID: <87h7tpa3hg.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:03:55 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>, Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>, Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Kevin Curtis <kevin.curtis@...site.co.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@...oth.com>, Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>, Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@...rochip.com>, Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, "Matthew Wilcox \(Oracle\)" <willy@...radead.org>, Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API Kees, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes: > This is the infrastructure changes to prepare the tasklet API for > conversion to passing the tasklet struct as the callback argument instead > of an arbitrary unsigned long. The first patch details why this is useful > (it's the same rationale as the timer_struct changes from a bit ago: > less abuse during memory corruption attacks, more in line with existing > ways of doing things in the kernel, save a little space in struct, > etc). Notably, the existing tasklet API use is much less messy, so there > is less to clean up. > > It's not clear to me which tree this should go through... Greg since it > starts with a USB clean-up, -tip for timer or interrupt, or if I should > just carry it. I'm open to suggestions, but if I don't hear otherwise, > I'll just carry it. > > My goal is to have this merged for v5.9-rc1 so that during the v5.10 > development cycle the new API will be available. The entire tree of > changes is here[1] currently, but to split it up by maintainer the > infrastructure changes need to be landed first. > > Review and Acks appreciated! :) I'd rather see tasklets vanish from the planet completely, but that's going to be a daring feat. So, grudgingly: Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.