|
Message-ID: <CALCETrUta5-0TLJ9-jfdehpTAp2Efmukk2npYadFzz9ozOrG2w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:16:32 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> To: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:32 AM Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Thanks. See inline.. > > On 7/28/20 10:13 AM, David Laight wrote: > > From: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com > >> Sent: 28 July 2020 14:11 > > ... > >> The kernel creates the trampoline mapping without any permissions. When > >> the trampoline is executed by user code, a page fault happens and the > >> kernel gets control. The kernel recognizes that this is a trampoline > >> invocation. It sets up the user registers based on the specified > >> register context, and/or pushes values on the user stack based on the > >> specified stack context, and sets the user PC to the requested target > >> PC. When the kernel returns, execution continues at the target PC. > >> So, the kernel does the work of the trampoline on behalf of the > >> application. > > Isn't the performance of this going to be horrid? > > It takes about the same amount of time as getpid(). So, it is > one quick trip into the kernel. I expect that applications will > typically not care about this extra overhead as long as > they are able to run. What did you test this on? A page fault on any modern x86_64 system is much, much, much, much slower than a syscall. --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.