|
Message-ID: <aa51eb26-e2a9-c448-a3b8-e9e68deeb468@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:51:32 -0400 From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Function Granular KASLR On 7/22/20 10:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: >> Let me CC live-patching ML, because from a quick glance this is something >> which could impact live patching code. At least it invalidates assumptions >> which "sympos" is based on. > > In a quick skim, it looks like the symbol resolution is using > kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), so I think this is safe? What's a good > selftest for live-patching? > Hi Kees, I don't think any of the in-tree tests currently exercise the kallsyms/sympos end of livepatching. I do have a local branch that does facilitate creating klp-relocations that do rely upon this feature -- I'll try to see if I can get those working with this patchset and report back later this week. -- Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.