|
Message-ID: <efb88aab-f9f9-4b66-e7ab-3aa054eec96e@digikod.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:04:28 +0200 From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> To: Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@...p-os.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, Christian Heimes <christian@...hon.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Eric Chiang <ericchiang@...gle.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>, Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Philippe Trébuchet <philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr>, Scott Shell <scottsh@...rosoft.com>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Steve Dower <steve.dower@...hon.org>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>, Vincent Strubel <vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] fs,doc: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC On 22/07/2020 18:16, Thibaut Sautereau wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:39:14PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> >> On 15/07/2020 22:37, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:16:36PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>>> @@ -2849,7 +2855,7 @@ static int may_open(const struct path *path, int acc_mode, int flag) >>>> case S_IFLNK: >>>> return -ELOOP; >>>> case S_IFDIR: >>>> - if (acc_mode & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC)) >>>> + if (acc_mode & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_OPENEXEC)) >>>> return -EISDIR; >>>> break; >>> >>> (I need to figure out where "open for reading" rejects S_IFDIR, since >>> it's clearly not here...) > > Doesn't it come from generic_read_dir() in fs/libfs.c? > >>> >>>> case S_IFBLK: >>>> @@ -2859,13 +2865,26 @@ static int may_open(const struct path *path, int acc_mode, int flag) >>>> fallthrough; >>>> case S_IFIFO: >>>> case S_IFSOCK: >>>> - if (acc_mode & MAY_EXEC) >>>> + if (acc_mode & (MAY_EXEC | MAY_OPENEXEC)) >>>> return -EACCES; >>>> flag &= ~O_TRUNC; >>>> break; >>> >>> This will immediately break a system that runs code with MAY_OPENEXEC >>> set but reads from a block, char, fifo, or socket, even in the case of >>> a sysadmin leaving the "file" sysctl disabled. >> >> As documented, O_MAYEXEC is for regular files. The only legitimate use >> case seems to be with pipes, which should probably be allowed when >> enforcement is disabled. > > By the way Kees, while we fix that for the next series, do you think it > would be relevant, at least for the sake of clarity, to add a > WARN_ON_ONCE(acc_mode & MAY_OPENEXEC) for the S_IFSOCK case, since a > socket cannot be open anyway? > We just did some more tests (for the next patch series) and it turns out that may_open() can return EACCES before another part returns ENXIO. As a reminder, the next series will deny access to block devices, character devices, fifo and socket when opened with O_MAYEXEC *and* if any policy is enforced (via the sysctl). The question is then: do we prefer to return EACCES when a policy is enforced (on a socket), or do we stick to the ENXIO? The EACCES approach will be more consistent with devices and fifo handling, and seems safer (belt and suspenders) thought.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.