[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d2dab03-289e-2872-db66-ce80ce5c189f@digikod.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:31:26 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 09/12] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall
On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>
>> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> @@ -857,9 +857,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_openat2, sys_openat2)
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd)
>> #define __NR_faccessat2 439
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2)
>> +#define __NR_landlock 440
>> +__SYSCALL(__NR_landlock, sys_landlock)
>>
>> #undef __NR_syscalls
>> -#define __NR_syscalls 440
>> +#define __NR_syscalls 441
>
> In linux-next, we already have:
>
> +#define __NR_watch_mount 440
> +#define __NR_watch_sb 441
> +#define __NR_fsinfo 442
> +#define __NR_process_madvise 443
>
> You may want to increase the number again.
>
> Arnd
>
OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next. Do you know if there is
other syscalls on their way to linux-next?
Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
