|
Message-ID: <20200702082040.GB4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:20:40 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] add support for Clang LTO On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:03:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > But it looks like we are going to have to tell the compiler. What does the current proposal look like? I can certainly annotate the seqcount latch users, but who knows what other code is out there....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.