[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee1a5921-c151-33a9-bdac-c5d039a94bdc@linux.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 02:45:00 +0300
From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gcc@....gnu.org, notify@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to
avoid useless register saving
On 10.06.2020 23:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:47:14PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
>> On 09.06.2020 21:46, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The inline asm statement that is used for instrumentation is arch-specific.
>> Trying to add
>> asm volatile("call stackleak_track_stack")
>> in gcc plugin on aarch64 makes gcc break spectacularly.
>
> Ah! Thank you, that eluded my eyes. :)
>
>> I pass the target arch name to the plugin and check it explicitly to avoid that.
>>
>> Moreover, I'm going to create a gcc enhancement request for supporting
>> no_caller_saved_registers attribute on aarch64.
>
> For arm64 right now it looks like the plugin will just remain
> "inefficient" in these cleanup, as before, yes?
Yes, for arm64 the instrumentation didn't change in this patch series.
I checked the disasm and see the similar issue with useless register saving.
I'm going to add asm instrumentation for arm64 when (I hope) the
no_caller_saved_registers attribute becomes available for that platform.
Best regards,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
