|
Message-ID: <CANiq72nfByD5sO0a2G2hKCPtHgOhdYfFaXcK7pHnxXRGRUUjDQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:05:46 +0200 From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> To: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>, Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc@....gnu.org, notify@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving Hi Alexander, On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:50 PM Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h > index cdf016596659..522d57ae8532 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ > # define __GCC4_has_attribute___nonstring__ 0 > # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_address__ (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 8) > # define __GCC4_has_attribute___fallthrough__ 0 > +# define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_caller_saved_registers__ 0 > #endif Nit: if you do another version, please move it before `noclone` to keep the order (`fallthrough` was added in the wrong place). Otherwise don't worry, I will sort it together with `fallthrough` when I send a patch. > +/* > + * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 7 > + * > + * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fcaller_005fsaved_005fregisters-function-attribute_002c-x86 > + * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-caller-saved-registers > + */ > +#if __has_attribute(__no_caller_saved_registers__) > +# define __no_caller_saved_registers __attribute__((__no_caller_saved_registers__)) > +#else > +# define __no_caller_saved_registers > +#endif Ditto. Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> Cheers, Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.