Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff05b833-720e-e1e2-f43b-8285d520a563@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:58:44 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Christopher M. Riedl" <cmr@...ormatik.wtf>,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/mm: Introduce temporary mm



Le 03/06/2020 à 07:19, Christopher M. Riedl a écrit :
> x86 supports the notion of a temporary mm which restricts access to
> temporary PTEs to a single CPU. A temporary mm is useful for situations
> where a CPU needs to perform sensitive operations (such as patching a
> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX kernel) requiring temporary mappings without exposing
> said mappings to other CPUs. A side benefit is that other CPU TLBs do
> not need to be flushed when the temporary mm is torn down.
> 
> Mappings in the temporary mm can be set in the userspace portion of the
> address-space.
> 
> Interrupts must be disabled while the temporary mm is in use. HW
> breakpoints, which may have been set by userspace as watchpoints on
> addresses now within the temporary mm, are saved and disabled when
> loading the temporary mm. The HW breakpoints are restored when unloading
> the temporary mm. All HW breakpoints are indiscriminately disabled while
> the temporary mm is in use.
> 
> Based on x86 implementation:
> 
> commit cefa929c034e
> ("x86/mm: Introduce temporary mm structs")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@...ormatik.wtf>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h       |  1 +
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c          |  5 ++
>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> index ec57daf87f40..827350c9bcf3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static inline int debugger_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
>   #endif
>   
>   void __set_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk);
> +void __get_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk);
>   bool ppc_breakpoint_available(void);
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
>   extern void do_send_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 1a474f6b1992..9269c7c7b04e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   #include <asm/mmu.h>	
>   #include <asm/cputable.h>
>   #include <asm/cputhreads.h>
> +#include <asm/debug.h>
>   
>   /*
>    * Most if the context management is out of line
> @@ -300,5 +301,68 @@ static inline int arch_dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *oldmm,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +struct temp_mm {
> +	struct mm_struct *temp;
> +	struct mm_struct *prev;
> +	bool is_kernel_thread;
> +	struct arch_hw_breakpoint brk[HBP_NUM_MAX];
> +};
> +
> +static inline void init_temp_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	temp_mm->temp = mm;
> +	temp_mm->prev = NULL;
> +	temp_mm->is_kernel_thread = false;
> +	memset(&temp_mm->brk, 0, sizeof(temp_mm->brk));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void use_temporary_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> +	temp_mm->is_kernel_thread = current->mm == NULL;
> +	if (temp_mm->is_kernel_thread)
> +		temp_mm->prev = current->active_mm;
> +	else
> +		temp_mm->prev = current->mm;

Is that necessary to make different for kernel threads ? When I look at 
x86 implementation, they don't do such a thing.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Hash requires a non-NULL current->mm to allocate a userspace address
> +	 * when handling a page fault. Does not appear to hurt in Radix either.
> +	 */
> +	current->mm = temp_mm->temp;
> +	switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, temp_mm->temp, current);
> +
> +	if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) {
> +		struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0};
> +		int i = 0;
> +
> +		for (; i < nr_wp_slots(); ++i) {
> +			__get_breakpoint(i, &temp_mm->brk[i]);
> +			if (temp_mm->brk[i].type != 0)
> +				__set_breakpoint(i, &null_brk);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unuse_temporary_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> +	if (temp_mm->is_kernel_thread)
> +		current->mm = NULL;
> +	else
> +		current->mm = temp_mm->prev;
> +	switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, temp_mm->prev, current);
> +
> +	if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) {
> +		int i = 0;
> +
> +		for (; i < nr_wp_slots(); ++i)
> +			if (temp_mm->brk[i].type != 0)
> +				__set_breakpoint(i, &temp_mm->brk[i]);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>   #endif /* __ASM_POWERPC_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 048d64c4e115..3973144f6980 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -825,6 +825,11 @@ static inline int set_breakpoint_8xx(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +void __get_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> +{
> +	memcpy(brk, this_cpu_ptr(&current_brk[nr]), sizeof(*brk));
> +}
> +
>   void __set_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
>   {
>   	memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(&current_brk[nr]), brk, sizeof(*brk));
> 

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.