[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c159d845-6108-4b67-6527-405589fa5382@digikod.net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:39:58 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 05/10] fs,landlock: Support filesystem access-control
On 14/05/2020 05:37, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
>> index 45cc10cdf6dd..2276642f8e05 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
>> @@ -1517,6 +1517,11 @@ struct super_block {
>> /* Pending fsnotify inode refs */
>> atomic_long_t s_fsnotify_inode_refs;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK
>> + /* References to Landlock underlying objects */
>> + atomic_long_t s_landlock_inode_refs;
>> +#endif
>> +
>
> This needs to be converted to the LSM API via superblock blob stacking.
>
> See Casey's old patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20190829232935.7099-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com/
s_landlock_inode_refs is quite similar to s_fsnotify_inode_refs, but I
can do it once the superblock security blob patch is upstream. Is it a
blocker for now? What is the current status of lbs_superblock?
Anyway, we also need to have a call to landlock_release_inodes() in
generic_shutdown_super(), which does not fit the LSM framework, and I
think it is not an issue. Landlock handling of inodes is quite similar
to fsnotify.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
