[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e654c90-bec5-6ba1-771e-648da94ef547@digikod.net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:21:21 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christian Heimes <christian@...hon.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Eric Chiang <ericchiang@...gle.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Philippe Trébuchet <philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr>,
Scott Shell <scottsh@...rosoft.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Steve Dower <steve.dower@...hon.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>,
Vincent Strubel <vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec
through O_MAYEXEC
On 14/05/2020 01:27, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:37:16AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Enable to forbid access to files open with O_MAYEXEC. Thanks to the
>>> noexec option from the underlying VFS mount, or to the file execute
>>> permission, userspace can enforce these execution policies. This may
>>> allow script interpreters to check execution permission before reading
>>> commands from a file, or dynamic linkers to allow shared object loading.
>>>
>>> Add a new sysctl fs.open_mayexec_enforce to enable system administrators
>>> to enforce two complementary security policies according to the
>>> installed system: enforce the noexec mount option, and enforce
>>> executable file permission. Indeed, because of compatibility with
>>> installed systems, only system administrators are able to check that
>>> this new enforcement is in line with the system mount points and file
>>> permissions. A following patch adds documentation.
>>>
>>> For tailored Linux distributions, it is possible to enforce such
>>> restriction at build time thanks to the CONFIG_OMAYEXEC_STATIC option.
>>> The policy can then be configured with CONFIG_OMAYEXEC_ENFORCE_MOUNT and
>>> CONFIG_OMAYEXEC_ENFORCE_FILE.
>>>
>>> Being able to restrict execution also enables to protect the kernel by
>>> restricting arbitrary syscalls that an attacker could perform with a
>>> crafted binary or certain script languages. It also improves multilevel
>>> isolation by reducing the ability of an attacker to use side channels
>>> with specific code. These restrictions can natively be enforced for ELF
>>> binaries (with the noexec mount option) but require this kernel
>>> extension to properly handle scripts (e.g., Python, Perl). To get a
>>> consistent execution policy, additional memory restrictions should also
>>> be enforced (e.g. thanks to SELinux).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>> Reviewed-by: Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>
>>> Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
>>> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
>>> index 33b6d372e74a..70f179f6bc6c 100644
>>> --- a/fs/namei.c
>>> +++ b/fs/namei.c
>>> @@ -411,10 +412,90 @@ static int sb_permission(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode, int mask)
>> <snip>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && !defined(CONFIG_OMAYEXEC_STATIC)
>>> +int proc_omayexec(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
>>> + size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>>> +{
>>> + int error;
>>> +
>>> + if (write) {
>>> + struct ctl_table table_copy;
>>> + int tmp_mayexec_enforce;
>>> +
>>> + if (!capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
>>> + return -EPERM;
>>
>> Not fond of using CAP_MAC_ADMIN here (or elsewhere outside of security
>> modules). The ability to set this sysctl is not equivalent to being
>> able to load a MAC policy, set arbitrary MAC labels on
>> processes/files, etc.
>
> That's fair. In that case, perhaps this could just use the existing
> _sysadmin helper? (Though I should note that these perm checks actually
> need to be in the open, not the read/write ... I thought there was a
> series to fix that, but I can't find it now. Regardless, that's
> orthogonal to this series.)
OK, I'll switch to CAP_SYS_ADMIN with proc_dointvec_minmax_sysadmin().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
