|
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rpZGiwrK93=+6z8qBdDVs273MaR_boDd1xjjZRwbqpKQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 18:06:17 -0600 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] security/keys: rewrite big_key crypto to use Zinc Hey Eric, Thanks for the review. I'll add `select CONFIG` as you suggested. I agree about trying to move as much as possible out of crypto and into lib/crypto. Breaking those dependency cycles won't be easy but perhaps it'll be possible to chip away at that gradually. (I'd also lib a lib/crypto/arch/{arch}/..., but I guess that's a separate discussion.) I'll also change -EINVAL to -EBADMSG. Nice catch. Regarding the buffer zeroing... are you sure? These buffers are already being copied into filesystem caches and all sorts of places over which we have zero control. At that point, does it matter? Or do you argue that because it's still technically key material, we should zero out both the plaintext and ciphertext everywhere we can, and hopefully at some point the places where we can't will go away? IOW, I'm fine doing that, but would like to learn your explicit reasoning before. Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.