[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202004201046.600183D@keescook>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:48:01 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecomb@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Function Granular Kernel Address Space Layout
Randomization
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:04:42PM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> Kristen Carlson Accardi (8):
> objtool: do not assume order of parent/child functions
> x86: tools/relocs: Support >64K section headers
Can these two patches land separately (i.e. "now")? CFI will need the
relocs fix too, so better to have this landed upstream for both
features. I see Josh's Ack in the first...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
