|
Message-ID: <9a562397-ba60-8979-1453-b88153722803@linux.com> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 21:11:44 +0300 From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr> Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle rule for CVE-2019-18683 Markus, thanks for your remarks! On 09.04.2020 11:41, Markus Elfring wrote: > * The source code search pattern can be too generic. > How do you think about to consider additional constraints > for safer data control flow analysis? Could you please elaborate on that? I used 'exists' keyword to find at least one branch that has mutex_unlock+kthread_stop+mutex_lock chain. > * Other operation modes might become helpful. Thanks! I added 'context' mode, it's very good for this purpose. Best regards, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.