Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202003311110.2B08091E@keescook>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:12:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF and CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:41:04AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 3/30/20 7:20 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 06:17:32PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:59 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> > > <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:14 AM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I noticed that CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF seems to partly defeat the point
> > > > > of CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT.
> > > > 
> > > > Is it a theoretical stmt or you have data?
> > > > I think it's the other way around.
> > > > gcc-plugin breaks dwarf and breaks btf.
> > > > But I only looked at gcc patches without applying them.
> > > 
> > > Ah, interesting - I haven't actually tested it, I just assumed
> > > (perhaps incorrectly) that the GCC plugin would deal with DWARF info
> > > properly.
> > 
> > Yeah, GCC appears to create DWARF before the plugin does the
> > randomization[1], so it's not an exposure, but yes, struct randomization
> > is pretty completely incompatible with a bunch of things in the kernel
> > (by design). I'm happy to add negative "depends" in the Kconfig if it
> > helps clarify anything.
> 
> Is this expected to get fixed at some point wrt DWARF? Perhaps would make

No, gcc closed the issue as "won't fix".

> sense then to add a negative "depends" for both DWARF and BTF if the option
> GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT is set given both would be incompatible/broken.

I hadn't just to keep wider randconfig build test coverage. That said, I
could make it be: depends COMPILE_TEST || !DWARF ...

I can certainly do that.

-Kees

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.