[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+Ux3-D_7ytRJx_Pz4fStRLS1vkM=-tGZ0paoD7n+JCLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:59:23 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF and CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:14 AM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF seems to partly defeat the point
> of CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT.
Is it a theoretical stmt or you have data?
I think it's the other way around.
gcc-plugin breaks dwarf and breaks btf.
But I only looked at gcc patches without applying them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
