[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200317164709.GA23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:47:09 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v14 06/10] landlock: Add syscall implementation
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> +static int get_path_from_fd(u64 fd, struct path *path)
> + /*
> + * Only allows O_PATH FD: enable to restrict ambiant (FS) accesses
> + * without requiring to open and risk leaking or misuing a FD. Accept
> + * removed, but still open directory (S_DEAD).
> + */
> + if (!(f.file->f_mode & FMODE_PATH) || !f.file->f_path.mnt ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Could you explain what that one had been be about? The underlined
subexpression is always false; was that supposed to check some
condition and if so, which one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
