[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202003021107.38017F90@keescook>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:08:02 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/11] kallsyms: hide layout and expose seed
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:01:56AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 20:27 +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%2Fproc%2Fkallsyms&literal=1
>
> I looked through some of these packages as Jann suggested, and it seems
> like there are several that are using /proc/kallsyms to look for
> specific symbol names to determine whether some feature has been
> compiled into the kernel. This practice seems dubious to me, knowing
> that many kernel symbol names can be changed at any time, but
> regardless seems to be fairly common.
Cool, so a sorted censored list is fine for non-root. Would root users
break on a symbol-name-sorted view? (i.e. are two lists needed or can we
stick to one?)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
