|
Message-Id: <20200228000105.165012-8-thgarnie@chromium.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:00:52 -0800 From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: kristen@...ux.intel.com, keescook@...omium.org, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v11 07/11] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the kernel to be PIE compatible. Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S index c8daa92f38dc..8e221285d9f1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ * Hooray, we are in Long 64-bit mode (but still running in low memory) */ SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64) - movq saved_magic, %rax + movq saved_magic(%rip), %rax movq $0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx cmpq %rdx, %rax je 2f @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64) movw %ax, %es movw %ax, %fs movw %ax, %gs - movq saved_rsp, %rsp + movq saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp - movq saved_rbx, %rbx - movq saved_rdi, %rdi - movq saved_rsi, %rsi - movq saved_rbp, %rbp + movq saved_rbx(%rip), %rbx + movq saved_rdi(%rip), %rdi + movq saved_rsi(%rip), %rsi + movq saved_rbp(%rip), %rbp - movq saved_rip, %rax + movq saved_rip(%rip), %rax jmp *%rax SYM_FUNC_END(wakeup_long64) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel) xorl %eax, %eax call save_processor_state - movq $saved_context, %rax + leaq saved_context(%rip), %rax movq %rsp, pt_regs_sp(%rax) movq %rbp, pt_regs_bp(%rax) movq %rsi, pt_regs_si(%rax) @@ -67,13 +67,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel) pushfq popq pt_regs_flags(%rax) - movq $.Lresume_point, saved_rip(%rip) + leaq .Lresume_point(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, saved_rip(%rip) - movq %rsp, saved_rsp - movq %rbp, saved_rbp - movq %rbx, saved_rbx - movq %rdi, saved_rdi - movq %rsi, saved_rsi + movq %rsp, saved_rsp(%rip) + movq %rbp, saved_rbp(%rip) + movq %rbx, saved_rbx(%rip) + movq %rdi, saved_rdi(%rip) + movq %rsi, saved_rsi(%rip) addq $8, %rsp movl $3, %edi @@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel) .align 4 .Lresume_point: /* We don't restore %rax, it must be 0 anyway */ - movq $saved_context, %rax + leaq saved_context(%rip), %rax movq saved_context_cr4(%rax), %rbx movq %rbx, %cr4 movq saved_context_cr3(%rax), %rbx -- 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.