|
Message-Id: <20200227193516.32566-3-keescook@chromium.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:35:12 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Elena Petrova <lenaptr@...gle.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, syzkaller@...glegroups.com Subject: [PATCH v5 2/6] ubsan: Split "bounds" checker from other options In order to do kernel builds with the bounds checker individually available, introduce CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS, with the remaining options under CONFIG_UBSAN_MISC. For example, using this, we can start to expand the coverage syzkaller is providing. Right now, all of UBSan is disabled for syzbot builds because taken as a whole, it is too noisy. This will let us focus on one feature at a time. For the bounds checker specifically, this provides a mechanism to eliminate an entire class of array overflows with close to zero performance overhead (I cannot measure a difference). In my (mostly) defconfig, enabling bounds checking adds ~4200 checks to the kernel. Performance changes are in the noise, likely due to the branch predictors optimizing for the non-fail path. Some notes on the bounds checker: - it does not instrument {mem,str}*()-family functions, it only instruments direct indexed accesses (e.g. "foo[i]"). Dealing with the {mem,str}*()-family functions is a work-in-progress around CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE[1]. - it ignores flexible array members, including the very old single byte (e.g. "int foo[1];") declarations. (Note that GCC's implementation appears to ignore _all_ trailing arrays, but Clang only ignores empty, 0, and 1 byte arrays[2].) [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/6 [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589 Suggested-by: Elena Petrova <lenaptr@...gle.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> --- lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- scripts/Makefile.ubsan | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan index 9deb655838b0..48469c95d78e 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL bool -config UBSAN +menuconfig UBSAN bool "Undefined behaviour sanity checker" help This option enables the Undefined Behaviour sanity checker. @@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ config UBSAN behaviours at runtime. For more details, see: Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst +if UBSAN + config UBSAN_TRAP bool "On Sanitizer warnings, abort the running kernel code" - depends on UBSAN depends on $(cc-option, -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error) help Building kernels with Sanitizer features enabled tends to grow @@ -25,9 +26,26 @@ config UBSAN_TRAP the system. For some system builders this is an acceptable trade-off. +config UBSAN_BOUNDS + bool "Perform array index bounds checking" + default UBSAN + help + This option enables detection of directly indexed out of bounds + array accesses, where the array size is known at compile time. + Note that this does not protect array overflows via bad calls + to the {str,mem}*cpy() family of functions (that is addressed + by CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE). + +config UBSAN_MISC + bool "Enable all other Undefined Behavior sanity checks" + default UBSAN + help + This option enables all sanity checks that don't have their + own Kconfig options. Disable this if you only want to have + individually selected checks. + config UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL bool "Enable instrumentation for the entire kernel" - depends on UBSAN depends on ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL # We build with -Wno-maybe-uninitilzed, but we still want to @@ -44,7 +62,6 @@ config UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL config UBSAN_NO_ALIGNMENT bool "Disable checking of pointers alignment" - depends on UBSAN default y if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS help This option disables the check of unaligned memory accesses. @@ -57,7 +74,9 @@ config UBSAN_ALIGNMENT config TEST_UBSAN tristate "Module for testing for undefined behavior detection" - depends on m && UBSAN + depends on m help This is a test module for UBSAN. It triggers various undefined behavior, and detect it. + +endif # if UBSAN diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan index 668a91510bfe..5b15bc425ec9 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan +++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan @@ -5,14 +5,19 @@ ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=alignment) endif +ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS + CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds) +endif + +ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_MISC CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=shift) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=integer-divide-by-zero) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=unreachable) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow) - CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=object-size) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bool) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=enum) +endif ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error) -- 2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.