[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ec24e38-1a6f-590a-3b30-50caae177e9b@digikod.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:34:59 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v14 00/10] Landlock LSM
On 25/02/2020 19:49, J Freyensee wrote:
>
>
> On 2/24/20 8:02 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>
>> ## Syscall
>>
>> Because it is only tested on x86_64, the syscall is only wired up for
>> this architecture. The whole x86 family (and probably all the others)
>> will be supported in the next patch series.
> General question for u. What is it meant "whole x86 family will be
> supported". 32-bit x86 will be supported?
Yes, I was referring to x86_32, x86_64 and x32, but all architectures
should be supported.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
