[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6df3e6b1-ffd1-dacf-2f2d-7df8e5aca668@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:49:52 -0800
From: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v14 00/10] Landlock LSM
On 2/24/20 8:02 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> ## Syscall
>
> Because it is only tested on x86_64, the syscall is only wired up for
> this architecture. The whole x86 family (and probably all the others)
> will be supported in the next patch series.
General question for u. What is it meant "whole x86 family will be
supported". 32-bit x86 will be supported?
Thanks,
Jay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
