[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:46:25 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] proc: Dentry flushing without proc_mnt
Just because it is less of a fundamental change and less testing I went
and looked at updating proc_flush_task to use a list as Al suggested.
If we can stand an sget/deactivate_super pair for every dentry we want
to invalidate I think I have something.
Comments from anyone will be appreciated I gave this some light testing
and the code is based on something similar already present in proc so
I think there is a high chance this code is correct but I could easily
be wrong.
Linus, does this approach look like something you can stand?
Eric
Eric W. Biederman (7):
proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache
proc: Mov rcu_read_(lock|unlock) in proc_prune_siblings_dcache
proc: Use d_invalidate in proc_prune_siblings_dcache
proc: Clear the pieces of proc_inode that proc_evict_inode cares about
proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc
proc: Ensure we see the exit of each process tid exactly once
fs/exec.c | 5 +--
fs/proc/base.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
fs/proc/inode.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
fs/proc/internal.h | 4 +-
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 45 +++-----------------
include/linux/pid.h | 2 +
include/linux/proc_fs.h | 4 +-
kernel/exit.c | 4 +-
kernel/pid.c | 16 +++++++
9 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
