|
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi5FOGV_3tALK3n6E2fK3Oa_yCYkYQtCSaXLSEm2DUCKg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:02:40 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/11] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs instances On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:41 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:38:33PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > > > Wait, I thought the whole point of that had been to allow multiple > > procfs instances for the same userns? Confused... > > s/userns/pidns/, sorry Right, but we still hold the ref to it here... [ Looks more ] Oooh. No we don't. Exactly because we don't hold the lock, only the rcu lifetime, the ref can go away from under us. I see what your concern is. Ouch, this is more painful than I expected - the code flow looked so simple. I really wanted to avoid a new lock during process shutdown, because that has always been somewhat painful. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.