Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg52stFtUxMOxs3afkwDWmWn1JXC7RJ7dPsTrJbnxpZVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:45:06 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, 
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, 
	Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/11] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs instances

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:01 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Fundamentally proc_flush_task is an optimization.  Just getting rid of
> dentries earlier.  At least at one point it was an important
> optimization because the old process dentries would just sit around
> doing nothing for anyone.

I'm pretty sure it's still important. It's very easy to generate a
_ton_ of dentries with /proc.

> I wonder if instead of invalidating specific dentries we could instead
> fire wake up a shrinker and point it at one or more instances of proc.

It shouldn't be the dentries themselves that are a freeing problem.
They're being RCU-free'd anyway because of lookup. It's the
proc_mounts list that is the problem, isn't it?

So it's just fs_info that needs to be rcu-delayed because it contains
that list. Or is there something else?

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.