Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:23:23 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <>
To: Alexey Gladkov <>
Cc: LKML <>, 
	Kernel Hardening <>, Linux API <>, 
	Linux FS Devel <>, 
	Linux Security Module <>, 
	Akinobu Mita <>, Alexander Viro <>, 
	Alexey Dobriyan <>, Andrew Morton <>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <>, Daniel Micay <>, 
	Djalal Harouni <>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <>, 
	"Eric W . Biederman" <>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <>, 
	Ingo Molnar <>, "J . Bruce Fields" <>, 
	Jeff Layton <>, Jonathan Corbet <>, 
	Kees Cook <>, Linus Torvalds <>, 
	Oleg Nesterov <>, Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] proc: move /proc/{self|thread-self} dentries to proc_fs_info

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 7:06 AM Alexey Gladkov <> wrote:
> This is a preparation patch that moves /proc/{self|thread-self} dentries
> to be stored inside procfs fs_info struct instead of making them per pid
> namespace. Since we want to support multiple procfs instances we need to
> make sure that these dentries are also per-superblock instead of
> per-pidns,

The changelog makes perfect sense so far...

> unmounting a private procfs won't clash with other procfs
> mounts.

This doesn't parse as part of the previous sentence.  I'm also not
convinced that this really involves unmounting per se.  Maybe just
delete these words.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.