[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201911210942.3C9F299@keescook>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:57:34 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Elena Petrova <lenaptr@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ubsan: Add trap instrumentation option
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:52:52PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 11/20/19 4:06 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > +config UBSAN_TRAP
> > + bool "On Sanitizer warnings, stop the offending kernel thread"
BTW, is there a way (with either GCC or Clang implementations) to
override the trap handler? If I could get the instrumentation to call
an arbitrarily named function, we could build a better version of this
that actually continued without the large increase in image size.
For example, instead of __builtin_trap(), call __ubsan_warning(), which
could be defined as something like:
static __always_inline void __ubsan_warning(void)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
That would make the warning survivable without the overhead of all the
debugging structures, etc.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
