[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201911131033.435C8F77D@keescook>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:33:38 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:03:38PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
> > > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack
> > > to protect against return address overwrites. More information
> >
> > Will, Catalin, Mark,
> >
> > What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been
> > addressed. Is it possible to land this via the arm tree for v5.5?
>
> I was planning to queue this for 5.6, given that I'd really like it to
> spend some quality time in linux-next.
Sounds fine to me; I just wanted to have an idea what to expect. :)
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
