[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=kcPS1CU=AUjOPr7SAipPFhs-v_mXi=AbqW5Vp9XUaiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:18:34 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] arm64: preserve x18 when CPU is suspended
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:47 AM <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Don't lose the current task's shadow stack when the CPU is suspended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/suspend.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/suspend.h
> index 8939c87c4dce..0cde2f473971 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/suspend.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/suspend.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_SUSPEND_H
> #define __ASM_SUSPEND_H
>
> -#define NR_CTX_REGS 12
> +#define NR_CTX_REGS 13
> #define NR_CALLEE_SAVED_REGS 12
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> index fdabf40a83c8..0e7c353c9dfd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> * cpu_do_suspend - save CPU registers context
> *
> * x0: virtual address of context pointer
> + *
> + * This must be kept in sync with struct cpu_suspend_ctx in <asm/suspend.h>.
> */
> ENTRY(cpu_do_suspend)
> mrs x2, tpidr_el0
> @@ -73,6 +75,9 @@ alternative_endif
> stp x8, x9, [x0, #48]
> stp x10, x11, [x0, #64]
> stp x12, x13, [x0, #80]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> + str x18, [x0, #96]
> +#endif
> ret
> ENDPROC(cpu_do_suspend)
>
> @@ -89,6 +94,10 @@ ENTRY(cpu_do_resume)
> ldp x9, x10, [x0, #48]
> ldp x11, x12, [x0, #64]
> ldp x13, x14, [x0, #80]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> + ldr x18, [x0, #96]
> + str xzr, [x0, #96]
How come we zero out x0+#96, but not for other offsets? Is this str necessary?
> +#endif
> msr tpidr_el0, x2
> msr tpidrro_el0, x3
> msr contextidr_el1, x4
> --
> 2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
