|
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-88USO+fbjBgj35B4fUQ7A_t9nHO_swyN=T1q1G2wViA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:21:48 +0200 From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: kprobes: fix kprobes without CONFIG_KRETPROBES On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 18:11, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote: > > This allows CONFIG_KRETPROBES to be disabled without disabling > kprobes entirely. > > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> Can we make kretprobes work with the shadow call stack instead? > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > index c4452827419b..98230ae979ca 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) > return (void *)orig_ret_address; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES > void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > @@ -564,6 +565,7 @@ int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > { > return 0; > } > +#endif > > int __init arch_init_kprobes(void) > { > -- > 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.