|
Message-ID: <CABCJKuf-tXu2ZhBMCYTHP3BU8g1i-0GGd7+YvyTDUc1kH2iZvA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:39:50 -0700 From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] arm64: efi: restore x18 if it was corrupted On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:20 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote: > You'll have to elaborate a bit here and explain that this is > sufficient, given that we run EFI runtime services with interrupts > enabled. I can add a note about this in v2. This is called with preemption disabled and we have a separate interrupt shadow stack, so as far as I can tell, this should be sufficient. Did you have concerns about this? Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.