[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKuf1cTHqvAC2hyCWjQbNEdGjx8dtfHGWwEvrEWzv+f7vZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:00:30 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] arm64: kbuild: reserve reg x18 from general
allocation by the compiler
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:32 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> > and remove the mention from
> > the LL/SC compiler flag override.
>
> was that cut/dropped from this patch?
>
> >
> > Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9836881/
>
> ^ Looks like it. Maybe it doesn't matter, but if sending a V2, maybe
> the commit message to be updated?
True. The original patch is from 2017 and the relevant part of
arm64/lib/Makefile no longer exists. I'll update this accordingly.
> I like how this does not conditionally reserve it based on the CONFIG
> for SCS. Hopefully later patches don't wrap it, but I haven't looked
> through all of them yet.
In a later patch x18 is only reserved with SCS. I'm fine with dropping
that patch and reserving it always, but wouldn't mind hearing thoughts
from the maintainers about this first.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
