|
Message-ID: <201909301547.8DC227B@keescook> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:49:39 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Romain Perier <romain.perier@...eris.fr> Subject: Re: [PRE-REVIEW PATCH 13/16] tasklet: Pass tasklet_struct pointer to callbacks unconditionally On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote: > From: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...eris.fr> > > Now that all tasklet callbacks are already taking their struct > tasklet_struct pointer as the callback argument, just do this > unconditionally and remove the .data field. It converts all > runtime code, init functions and the DECLARE_TASKLET() macros > to get rid of the .data argument. Moreover, all remaining use > or assignment of the .data field are removed in a single shot. > > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...eris.fr> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/atmel/at76c50x-usb.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c | 1 - > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c | 1 - > drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c | 1 - > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/snps_udc_core.c | 1 - > include/linux/interrupt.h | 9 ++++----- > kernel/softirq.c | 5 ++--- > net/atm/pppoatm.c | 1 - > 12 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Similar to the other suggestions, I would split out the individual changes that that touch the .data assignments. This makes those "unusual" cases easier to review. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > index 82630db0394b..357d14ae32d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > @@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ bool intel_engine_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > if (tasklet_trylock(t)) { > /* Must wait for any GPU reset in progress. */ > if (__tasklet_is_enabled(t)) > - t->func(t->data); > + t->func(t); > tasklet_unlock(t); > } > local_bh_enable(); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > index d630dbc953ad..99f39047e49f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > @@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ static void execlists_reset_finish(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > */ > GEM_BUG_ON(!reset_in_progress(execlists)); > if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&execlists->queue.rb_root)) > - execlists->tasklet.func(execlists->tasklet.data); > + execlists->tasklet.func(&execlists->tasklet); > > if (__tasklet_enable(&execlists->tasklet)) > /* And kick in case we missed a new request submission. */ > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c > index 1c4817c05d3c..14cedee27f2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c > @@ -1693,7 +1693,6 @@ usbnet_probe (struct usb_interface *udev, const struct usb_device_id *prod) > skb_queue_head_init (&dev->done); > skb_queue_head_init(&dev->rxq_pause); > dev->bh.func = (TASKLET_FUNC_TYPE)usbnet_bh; > - dev->bh.data = (TASKLET_DATA_TYPE)&dev->delay; > INIT_WORK (&dev->kevent, usbnet_deferred_kevent); > init_usb_anchor(&dev->deferred); > timer_setup(&dev->delay, usbnet_bh, 0); > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/at76c50x-usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/at76c50x-usb.c > index 3a66538a0853..fd796a32c71d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/at76c50x-usb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/at76c50x-usb.c > @@ -1199,7 +1199,6 @@ static void at76_rx_callback(struct urb *urb) > { > struct at76_priv *priv = urb->context; > > - priv->rx_tasklet.data = (unsigned long)urb; Some of these looks very strange -- how are the urb and tasklet associated, etc? > tasklet_schedule(&priv->rx_tasklet); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c > index 187095e13294..ae656563a82d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c > @@ -3183,7 +3183,7 @@ prism2_init_local_data(struct prism2_helper_functions *funcs, int card_idx, > /* Initialize tasklets for handling hardware IRQ related operations > * outside hw IRQ handler */ > #define HOSTAP_TASKLET_INIT(q, f, d) \ > -do { memset((q), 0, sizeof(*(q))); (q)->func = (TASKLET_FUNC_TYPE)(f); (q)->data = (TASKLET_DATA_TYPE)(q); } \ > +do { memset((q), 0, sizeof(*(q))); (q)->func = (TASKLET_FUNC_TYPE)(f); } \ > while (0) > HOSTAP_TASKLET_INIT(&local->bap_tasklet, hostap_bap_tasklet, > (unsigned long) local); > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c > index aae5c5aa1769..7e9bdbd2a6f4 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c > @@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ static int _rtl_usb_init_rx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > > skb_queue_head_init(&rtlusb->rx_queue); > rtlusb->rx_work_tasklet.func = (TASKLET_FUNC_TYPE)_rtl_rx_work; > - rtlusb->rx_work_tasklet.data = (TASKLET_DATA_TYPE)&rtlusb->rx_work_tasklet; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c > index 0ebbd727a452..4275549f4d98 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c > @@ -1181,7 +1181,6 @@ static inline void init_usb_rx(struct zd_usb *usb) > ZD_ASSERT(rx->fragment_length == 0); > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rx->idle_work, zd_rx_idle_timer_handler); > rx->reset_timer_tasklet.func = (TASKLET_FUNC_TYPE)zd_usb_reset_rx_idle_timer_tasklet; > - rx->reset_timer_tasklet.data = (TASKLET_DATA_TYPE)&rx->reset_timer_tasklet; These look like open-coded tasklet initializations? -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.