[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201907311257.8436E997A4@keescook>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:58:06 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@...il.com>
Cc: re.emese@...il.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
jinb.park7@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] randstruct: fix a bug in is_pure_ops_struct()
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:01:10AM +0900, Joonwon Kang wrote:
> Before this, there were false negatives in the case where a struct
> contains other structs which contain only function pointers because
> of unreachable code in is_pure_ops_struct().
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@...il.com>
I've applied this (with some commit log tweaks) and it should be visible
in linux-next soon. I'll send this on to Linus before -rc3.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
