[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201907221031.8B87A9DE@keescook>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:33:39 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, apw@...onical.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] string.h: Add stracpy/stracpy_pad (was: Re: [PATCH]
checkpatch: Added warnings in favor of strscpy().)
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:15:57PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:46 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 11:24 +0530, Nitin Gote wrote:
> > > Added warnings in checkpatch.pl script to :
> > >
> > > 1. Deprecate strcpy() in favor of strscpy().
> > > 2. Deprecate strlcpy() in favor of strscpy().
> > > 3. Deprecate strncpy() in favor of strscpy() or strscpy_pad().
> > >
> > > Updated strncpy() section in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> > > to cover strscpy_pad() case.
>
> []
>
> I sent a patch series for some strscpy/strlcpy misuses.
>
> How about adding a macro helper to avoid the misuses like:
> ---
> include/linux/string.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/string.h b/include/linux/string.h
> index 4deb11f7976b..ef01bd6f19df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/string.h
> +++ b/include/linux/string.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,22 @@ ssize_t strscpy(char *, const char *, size_t);
> /* Wraps calls to strscpy()/memset(), no arch specific code required */
> ssize_t strscpy_pad(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count);
>
> +#define stracpy(to, from) \
> +({ \
> + size_t size = ARRAY_SIZE(to); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(*to), char)); \
> + \
> + strscpy(to, from, size); \
> +})
> +
> +#define stracpy_pad(to, from) \
> +({ \
> + size_t size = ARRAY_SIZE(to); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(*to), char)); \
> + \
> + strscpy_pad(to, from, size); \
> +})
> +
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_STRCAT
> extern char * strcat(char *, const char *);
> #endif
This seems like a reasonable addition, yes. I think Coccinelle might
actually be able to find all the existing strscpy(dst, src, sizeof(dst))
cases to jump-start this conversion.
Devil's advocate: this adds yet more string handling functions... will
this cause even more confusion?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
