Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190716183517.GA129705@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:35:17 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	c0d1n61at3@...il.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, keescook@...omium.org,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, neilb@...e.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, peterz@...radead.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, will@...nel.org,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader
 checking

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:22:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:00:17PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This patch adds support for checking RCU reader sections in list
> > traversal macros. Optionally, if the list macro is called under SRCU or
> > other lock/mutex protection, then appropriate lockdep expressions can be
> > passed to make the checks pass.
> > 
> > Existing list_for_each_entry_rcu() invocations don't need to pass the
> > optional fourth argument (cond) unless they are under some non-RCU
> > protection and needs to make lockdep check pass.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> 
> If you fold in the checks for extra parameters, I will take this
> one and also 1/9.

I folded the checks in and also threw in the rcu-sync with Oleg's ack:

Could you pull into /dev branch?

git pull https://github.com/joelagnel/linux-kernel.git list-first-three
(Based on your dev branch)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.