|
Message-Id: <20190716182642.GB22819@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:26:42 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com> To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, c0d1n61at3@...il.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, keescook@...omium.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, kernel-team@...roid.com, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, neilb@...e.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, peterz@...radead.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>, rcu@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, will@...nel.org, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:00:18PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > The rcu/sync code was doing its own check whether we are in a reader > section. With RCU consolidating flavors and the generic helper added in > this series, this is no longer need. We can just use the generic helper > and it results in a nice cleanup. > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org> This needs to be forward-ported to current mainline. (Or, I believe equivalently for this file, to branch "dev" of -rcu.) Especially given that you have Oleg's Ack, I would be happy to take the forward-ported version. Thanx, Paul > --- > Please note: Only build and boot tested this particular patch so far. > > include/linux/rcu_sync.h | 5 ++--- > kernel/rcu/sync.c | 22 ---------------------- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcu_sync.h b/include/linux/rcu_sync.h > index 6fc53a1345b3..c954f1efc919 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rcu_sync.h > +++ b/include/linux/rcu_sync.h > @@ -39,9 +39,8 @@ extern void rcu_sync_lockdep_assert(struct rcu_sync *); > */ > static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync *rsp) > { > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU > - rcu_sync_lockdep_assert(rsp); > -#endif > + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(), > + "suspicious rcu_sync_is_idle() usage"); > return !rsp->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */ > } > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/sync.c b/kernel/rcu/sync.c > index a8304d90573f..535e02601f56 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/sync.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/sync.c > @@ -10,37 +10,25 @@ > #include <linux/rcu_sync.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU > -#define __INIT_HELD(func) .held = func, > -#else > -#define __INIT_HELD(func) > -#endif > - > static const struct { > void (*sync)(void); > void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *)); > void (*wait)(void); > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU > - int (*held)(void); > -#endif > } gp_ops[] = { > [RCU_SYNC] = { > .sync = synchronize_rcu, > .call = call_rcu, > .wait = rcu_barrier, > - __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_held) > }, > [RCU_SCHED_SYNC] = { > .sync = synchronize_rcu, > .call = call_rcu, > .wait = rcu_barrier, > - __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_sched_held) > }, > [RCU_BH_SYNC] = { > .sync = synchronize_rcu, > .call = call_rcu, > .wait = rcu_barrier, > - __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_bh_held) > }, > }; > > @@ -49,16 +37,6 @@ enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY }; > > #define rss_lock gp_wait.lock > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU > -void rcu_sync_lockdep_assert(struct rcu_sync *rsp) > -{ > - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!gp_ops[rsp->gp_type].held(), > - "suspicious rcu_sync_is_idle() usage"); > -} > - > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_sync_lockdep_assert); > -#endif > - > /** > * rcu_sync_init() - Initialize an rcu_sync structure > * @rsp: Pointer to rcu_sync structure to be initialized > -- > 2.22.0.510.g264f2c817a-goog >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.